Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport from 7_6_X: ttbar event categorizer, miniAOD jet flavour improvements #11559

Conversation

bartosik-hep
Copy link
Contributor

Backport of PRs from CMSSW_7_6_X: 10564, 11081

  • Protected JetFlavour tool against missing jet constituents in miniAOD. No crashes any more.
  • Switched off jet reclustering in the test configuration of GenHFHadronMatcher in miniAOD.
    • Excluded neutrinos from reclustered jets in AOD to match the ones in miniAOD.
  • Added an improved version of the custom ttbar-categorisation producer provided in the TWiki, based on the GenHFHadronMatcher tool.
    • Allows to separate between different tt+jets subprocesss with a single integer number: tt+bb, tt+cc, tt+2b, tt+2c, tt+light jet, etc.
    • Supports all decay channels of the ttbar system.
    • To be used by Top and ttH analyses.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bartosik-desy (Nazar Bartosik) for CMSSW_7_4_X.

Backport from 7_6_X: ttbar event categorizer, miniAOD jet flavour improvements

It involves the following packages:

PhysicsTools/JetMCAlgos
TopQuarkAnalysis/TopTools

@cmsbuild, @vadler, @monttj can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ferencek, @acaudron, @pvmulder, @kreczko, @imarches this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants