Adjustments to SiPixelCalSingleMuon producers

[mmusich]

PR description:

The goal of this PR is two-fold:

• reduce the event prescale of ALCARECOSiPixelCalSingleMuonLoose from 100 to 10, as operational experience has shown that the amount of collected data with the current prescale in 2022 is too low to be useful.
• use the SiPixelCalSingleMuon eventSetupPathsKey for ALCARECOSiPixelCalSingleMuonTight (as it can be shared among the different flavours of Muon-based pixel AlCaRecos, as discussed at Remove hardcoded trigger bits from AlCaRecos and include it as a key in the alcareco trigger bits tag. cms-AlCaDB/AlCaTools#70)

PR validation:

cmssw compiles.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, but will be backported to CMSSW_12_4_X for data-taking operations

[mmusich]

type trk, bugfix

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-39025/31499

• This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Calibration/TkAlCaRecoProducers (alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mmusich, @threus, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[tvami]

@cmsbuild , please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-04f801/26747/summary.html
COMMIT: 6950bde
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_5_X_2022-08-10-1100/el8_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/39025/26747/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
11609.0 step 3
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 7 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 51
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3692476
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 13
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3692440
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 50 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 312.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
• Checked 212 log files, 49 edm output root files, 51 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: found differences in 1 / 50 workflows

[tvami]

+alca

• tests pass
• PR is according to the desc

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[qliphy]

+1