-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update beamspot in 12_4_X relval samples #39548
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @kskovpen for CMSSW_12_4_X. It involves the following packages:
@bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @sunilUIET can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
Hi @kskovpen Best, |
Let's trigger the tests - many of them will fail for now. Will do it literately on a daily basis until we converge. |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT
RelVals
RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...
|
Hi @kskovpen |
I recall that PU wfs run more efficiently with 2 streams. |
@cmsbuild please test Normally, the noPU inputs should be available. |
please test |
@perrotta @rappoccio not sure if the bot is operational? |
@cmsbuild please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT
RelVals-INPUT
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Looks like it - the relval input errors are solved, though. |
@cms-sw/orp-l2 is this known? |
No, that unit test error is not present in the 12_4_X IBs. By the way, @kskovpen @tvami : there is no need to repeat the tests when you see RelValInputs error (unless there is any hint that they can be originated by the PR inspected): they show up quite often and are well known, and normally not a reason to get alarmed. |
please test |
This PR is a special case that if we see relvals input error, we need to make sure it comes from a glitch, or it is really a missing, as it defines a new set of datasets as input. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-356284/29132/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@srimanob please sign this PR as well |
+pdmv |
Hi @kskovpen |
+Upgrade We may need to follow up the master on RelValGluGluTo2Jets as mentioned in #39548 (comment) |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
great. So now the relval PU libraries will have one vertex smearing, but the signals still the the old one (awaiting #39019 to be merged) |
Hi @srimanob , yes, these wfs were successfully generated in 12_4_9_patch1 by adding "process.options.numberOfConcurrentLuminosityBlocks = 1" to customization. |
Hi @kskovpen
|
PR description:
Follows https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/PDMVRELVALS-171.
The new 12_4_X input samples for relval wfs are produced that use realistic beamspot, so that it is also consistent with #39041.
PR validation:
Need to wait for the production of samples.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Not a backport. This PR needs to go directly to 12_4_X for it to not interfere with the newer 12_5_X samples used in the master.