-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restoring 2023 RelVal Inputs #46909
Restoring 2023 RelVal Inputs #46909
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
please test workflows 12634.0, 12634.21, 12634.99 |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46909/42966
|
A new Pull Request was created by @AdrianoDee for master. It involves the following packages:
@AdrianoDee, @Moanwar, @DickyChant, @miquork, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
type bug-fix |
please abort |
test parameters:
|
please test |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 60KB to repository The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here:
Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
|
+pdmv |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
In PR #46793 I had the brilliant idea of removing 2023 inputs dataset. Of course this was a silly mistake. Restoring them here.