Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use of deprecated Chainlink API #156

Closed
code423n4 opened this issue Feb 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Use of deprecated Chainlink API #156

code423n4 opened this issue Feb 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@code423n4
Copy link
Contributor

Handle

defsec

Vulnerability details

Impact

The contract uses Chainlink’s deprecated API latestAnswer(). Such functions might suddenly stop working if Chainlink stopped supporting deprecated APIs.

Impact: Deprecated API stops working. Prices cannot be obtained. Protocol stops and contracts have to be redeployed.

See similar Low-severity finding L11 from OpenZeppelin's Audit of Opyn Gamma Protocol: https://blog.openzeppelin.com/opyn-gamma-protocol-audit/

This was a Medium-severity finding even in the previous version of WildCredit contest as well: code-423n4/2021-07-wildcredit-findings#75 where it was reported that "latestAnswer method will return the last value, but you won’t be able to check if the data is fresh. On the other hand, calling the method latestRoundData allow you to run some extra validations”

Proof of Concept

https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-01-notional/blob/main/contracts/utils/EIP1271Wallet.sol#L176

See https://docs.chain.link/docs/deprecated-aggregatorinterface-api-reference/#latestanswer.

Tools Used

Code Review

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Consider to add checks on the return data with proper revert messages if the price is stale or the round is incomplete, for example:

(uint80 roundID, int256 price, , uint256 timeStamp, uint80 answeredInRound) = ETH_CHAINLINK.latestRoundData();
require(price > 0, "Chainlink price <= 0");
require(answeredInRound >= roundID, "...");
require(timeStamp != 0, "...");
@code423n4 code423n4 added 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working labels Feb 2, 2022
code423n4 added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 2, 2022
@jeffywu jeffywu added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Feb 6, 2022
@jeffywu
Copy link
Collaborator

jeffywu commented Feb 6, 2022

Duplicate #178

@pauliax
Copy link
Collaborator

pauliax commented Feb 12, 2022

A duplicate of #197

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants