Patch unittest.makeSuite to unblock Python 3.13 support

[bdice]

Checklist

• Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
• Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
• Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
• Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
• Ensured the license file is being packaged.

Unblocks #34 by patching around conda/pycosat#100.

[bdice]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipe/meta.yaml:

• ❌ This recipe is using a compiler, which now requires adding a build dependence on {{ stdlib("c") }} as well. Note that this rule applies to each output of the recipe using a compiler. For further details, please see META: {{ stdlib("c") }} migration conda-forge.github.io#2102.

For recipe/meta.yaml:

• ℹ️ No valid build backend found for Python recipe for package pycosat using pip. Python recipes using pip need to explicitly specify a build backend in the host section. If your recipe has built with only pip in the host section in the past, you likely should add setuptools to the host section of your recipe.

_{This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/12014858737. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.}

[bdice]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[stonebig]

pushing an updated wheel on PyPi would be loved

[bdice]

@stonebig I filed a PR to update pycosat upstream here: conda/pycosat#101