Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(lineage): fix missed casing in lineage registry #6078

Conversation

gabe-lyons
Copy link
Contributor

The lineage registry was not consistently using toLowerCase, causing some lineage edges to be hidden.

Checklist

  • The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
  • Links to related issues (if applicable)
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
  • Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
  • For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 28, 2022

Unit Test Results (build & test)

584 tests  ±0   580 ✔️ ±0   12m 51s ⏱️ -38s
143 suites ±0       4 💤 ±0 
143 files   ±0       0 ±0 

Results for commit 4cd20f4. ± Comparison against base commit 79575b2.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@@ -53,12 +53,12 @@ public void testRegistry() {
assertTrue(lineageSpec.getUpstreamEdges()
.contains(new LineageRegistry.EdgeInfo("DownstreamOf", RelationshipDirection.OUTGOING, "dataset")));
assertTrue(lineageSpec.getUpstreamEdges()
.contains(new LineageRegistry.EdgeInfo("Produces", RelationshipDirection.INCOMING, "dataJob")));
.contains(new LineageRegistry.EdgeInfo("Produces", RelationshipDirection.INCOMING, "datajob")));
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Waitttt are the edges really having lower case?

@gabe-lyons gabe-lyons merged commit 2662163 into datahub-project:master Sep 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants