Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(ci): remove duplicate fail-fast option causing invalid workflow #7170

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

fix(ci): remove duplicate fail-fast option causing invalid workflow #7170

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

anshbansal
Copy link
Collaborator

Seems #7132 introduced a wrong block which has caused all runs to fail since then.

Checklist

  • The PR conforms to DataHub's Contributing Guideline (particularly Commit Message Format)
  • Links to related issues (if applicable)
  • Tests for the changes have been added/updated (if applicable)
  • Docs related to the changes have been added/updated (if applicable). If a new feature has been added a Usage Guide has been added for the same.
  • For any breaking change/potential downtime/deprecation/big changes an entry has been made in Updating DataHub

@github-actions github-actions bot added the devops PR or Issue related to DataHub backend & deployment label Jan 29, 2023
@anshbansal anshbansal mentioned this pull request Jan 29, 2023
Merged
5 tasks
@anshbansal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Seems already raised at https://github.com/datahub-project/datahub/pull/7161/files

@anshbansal anshbansal closed this Jan 29, 2023
@hsheth2 hsheth2 deleted the aseem-fix-github-action branch January 30, 2023 18:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pedro93 pedro93 pedro93 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
devops PR or Issue related to DataHub backend & deployment
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@anshbansal @pedro93