-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Set / document default envoy circuit_breakers #1574
Comments
devinrsmith
changed the title
Leaking server-side StreamObservers leads to "overflow" failures
Document envoy circuit_breakers
Nov 15, 2021
devinrsmith
changed the title
Document envoy circuit_breakers
Set / document default envoy circuit_breakers
Nov 15, 2021
Proposal:
|
mofojed
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 25, 2023
Release notes https://github.com/deephaven/web-client-ui/releases/tag/v0.51.0 # [0.51.0](deephaven/web-client-ui@v0.50.0...v0.51.0) (2023-10-24) ### Bug Fixes * Adjusted Monaco "white" colors ([#1594](deephaven/web-client-ui#1594)) ([c736708](deephaven/web-client-ui@c736708)), closes [#1592](deephaven/web-client-ui#1592) * cap width of columns with long names ([#1574](deephaven/web-client-ui#1574)) ([876a6ac](deephaven/web-client-ui@876a6ac)), closes [#1276](deephaven/web-client-ui#1276) * Enabled pointer capabilities for Firefox in Playwright ([#1589](deephaven/web-client-ui#1589)) ([f440a38](deephaven/web-client-ui@f440a38)), closes [#1588](deephaven/web-client-ui#1588) * Remove @deephaven/app-utils from @deephaven/dashboard-core-plugins dependency list ([#1596](deephaven/web-client-ui#1596)) ([7b59763](deephaven/web-client-ui@7b59763)), closes [#1593](deephaven/web-client-ui#1593) * Tab in console input triggers autocomplete instead of indent ([#1591](deephaven/web-client-ui#1591)) ([fbe1e70](deephaven/web-client-ui@fbe1e70)) ### Features * Theming - Spectrum Provider ([#1582](deephaven/web-client-ui#1582)) ([a4013c0](deephaven/web-client-ui@a4013c0)), closes [#1543](deephaven/web-client-ui#1543) * Theming Iris Grid ([#1568](deephaven/web-client-ui#1568)) ([ed8f4b7](deephaven/web-client-ui@ed8f4b7)) * web-client-ui changes required for deephaven.ui ([#1567](deephaven/web-client-ui#1567)) ([94ab25c](deephaven/web-client-ui@94ab25c)) * Widget plugins ([#1564](deephaven/web-client-ui#1564)) ([94cc82c](deephaven/web-client-ui@94cc82c)), closes [#1455](deephaven/web-client-ui#1455) [#1167](deephaven/web-client-ui#1167) ### BREAKING CHANGES - `usePlugins` and `PluginsContext` were moved from `@deephaven/app-utils` to `@deephaven/plugin`. - `useLoadTablePlugin` was moved from `@deephaven/app-utils` to `@deephaven/dashboard-core-plugins`. - `useConnection` and `ConnectionContext` were moved from `@deephaven/app-utils` to `@deephaven/jsapi-components`. - `DeephavenPluginModuleMap` was removed from `@deephaven/redux`. Use `PluginModuleMap` from `@deephaven/plugin` instead. * Enterprise will need ThemeProvider for the css variables to be available Co-authored-by: deephaven-internal <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Old title, TLDR: Leaking server-side StreamObservers leads to "overflow" failures
While testing out #1440 via a java client WIP, I noticed that I was not getting server-side responses to my input table requests. Turns out there is a server-side bug where the StreamObserver is not completing (to be fixed in #1565), essentially causing the server-side to "leak" StreamObservers.
For testing my java client, I continued on, and started ignoring the response from the server so I could continue on without the server-side fix.
Things seemed to work just fine, until I noticed that the first 1024 requests "worked" (I was able to see the input table changes in the UI), but future requests would not work. I was able to reproduce this 100% of the time by restarting the client.
I then instrumented my client to not ignore errors, and got back:
after 1024 requests.
Either of the following "fixed" the issue
When trying multiple clients at the same time, the overflow was reach when the sum-total of leaked observers reached 1024, which seemed to suggest that this was some sort of global envoy setting.
@niloc132 researched, and found https://www.envoyproxy.io/docs/envoy/latest/intro/arch_overview/upstream/circuit_breaking:
Given our push-based subscription model, this likely means that, by default, our envoy configuration would start failing once a server had 1024 subscriptions, and likely sooner due to other concurrent requests.
This patch:
pushed that limit up to 1 million.
We'll likely want some documentation on the proper envoy circuit breaker limit depending on deployment needs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: