-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 311
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove non-working Detach function #136
Conversation
The function returns "422 Attachment not found" all the time (tested with doctl), and the doc* also says that droplet id should be specified. * https://developers.digitalocean.com/documentation/v2/#remove-a-block-storage-volume-from-a-droplet
Sometimes it work, sometimes it does not .. Weird.. |
@klausenbusk Detach function is working well for me. Both from However, there's something weird in API docs. Detach endpoint is really missing in the docs. There are only 2 -> both requiring Maybe someone who have more info can update us: |
I have seen this behavior as well, specifically as part of a driver that @protochron contributed to REX-Ray. We have an issue open for it here. It is weird to me that the docs say that a droplet ID is required, but the I haven't actually seen this happen in a few weeks, but @klausenbusk said he saw it yesterday, so I'd like to be able to help pin down what is happening. |
What region is you using block storage in?
But
|
I'm using Block Storage in NYC1.
|
I think I have found a way to reproduce this. It seems like detach stop working after the volume has been attached to more than 1 droplet. See script: https://gist.github.com/klausenbusk/d5b6455d3253a2b0575e151719a0d12b Could you try attaching |
Can confirm this is a problem:
However, this is API bug and not
I think we need to wait official answer from DO member or maybe contact support so they report it to appropriate team. |
I have created a ticket and linked to this issue, let see what they say. |
The supporter was able to recreate the issue and will write up a bug report for it. |
Hey folks, the people responsible for this part of the system are out this week, they'll be back on monday and we should have a final decision if this call will go away or not. |
Hi. Great, thanks for update 👍
|
Hey folks, this is really going away, detaching volumes without droplet-id is not supported. |
Thanks for update! Going to vendor it to doctl |
The function returns "422 Attachment not found" all the time (tested
with doctl), and the doc* also says that droplet id should be
specified.