Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: pass SinkReplyBuilder and Transaction explicitly. Part1 #3946

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

romange
Copy link
Collaborator

@romange romange commented Oct 18, 2024

For some of our commands we need to inject another transaction and another SinkReplyBuilder. This results into error-prone injections of temporary objects into ConnectionContext. Most commands just need Transaction and SinkReplyBuilder, so lets pass them explicitly. The final goal will be to remove Transaction and reply_builder fields from ConnectionContext.

For some of our commands we need to inject another transaction and another SinkReplyBuilder.
This results into error-prone injections of temporary objects into ConnectionContext.
Most commands just need Transaction and SinkReplyBuilder, so lets pass them explicitly.
The final goal will be to remove Transaction and reply_builder fields from ConnectionContext.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gershman <[email protected]>
@romange romange merged commit 3028314 into main Oct 20, 2024
12 checks passed
@romange romange deleted the Pr3 branch October 20, 2024 16:54
romange added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2024
@dranikpg dranikpg mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2024
romange added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
romange added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants