Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor doc typo fixes on non linear measurement models #606

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2022
Merged

Conversation

sdhiscocks
Copy link
Member

Raised in #605

@sdhiscocks sdhiscocks requested a review from a team as a code owner February 22, 2022 10:02
@sdhiscocks sdhiscocks requested review from jswright-dstl and svidal-dstl and removed request for a team February 22, 2022 10:02
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 22, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #606 (0072ac7) into main (071abc8) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #606   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.37%   94.37%           
=======================================
  Files         154      154           
  Lines        7443     7443           
  Branches     1414     1414           
=======================================
  Hits         7024     7024           
  Misses        315      315           
  Partials      104      104           
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 68.01% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
unittests 91.75% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
stonesoup/models/measurement/nonlinear.py 98.94% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 071abc8...0072ac7. Read the comment docs.

@sdhiscocks sdhiscocks merged commit ffd6850 into main Mar 10, 2022
@sdhiscocks sdhiscocks deleted the doc_typo branch March 10, 2022 09:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants