Give the readme a little love #163 #258
Conversation
Give the readme a little love #163
ghost
requested a review
from 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for this! Also looking forward to seeing that issue be closed 😉 (we can come back to it)
Would like to see a tiny change in the order that the information is presented. I firmly believe developers read the first sentence and then skim the rest - I don't think our first sentence quite reflects what we want to convey to our github audience 😊
README.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| # Why? | ||
| DWYL LTD is incorporated and registered in England and Wales with company number 09525434 and registered office is at DWYL LTD, 104 Mary Datchelor Close, London, SE5 7DY, United Kingdom. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this needs a tiny bit of expansion, I always talk about first and foremost being an open source community and that is the friendliness I'd like to convey, see: dwyl/start-here#117
I think that that and the mission is way more important than the registered company for now, particularly with regards to our github audience (vs our website audience which is more client-focused) and should be the first thing people read 😊
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I thought it would be handy considering it's the ops and admin repo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree it's important info, particularly the registered company no. and address, I'm just requesting we move the info around to reflect what we want our audience to see first - most people who get here don't know dwyl as anything more than an awesome online resource!
iteles
added
the
in-review
iteles
removed
the
in-review
|
Is it possible for reviewers to edit the file directly rather than suggest changes? I wouldn't be offended if you wanted to make a change like that when reviewing! I misread your first message and thought you didn't want it rather than just moving it down |
|
@markwilliamfirth It is, but then it would still require a review from you. For small changes like this and typos it's probably the better way 👍 |
|
The former might be more beneficial - probably would have been quicker (in terms of our combined time) rather than explaining etc with me reviewing i'd see and understand what you'd want changing |
Give the readme a little love #163