update(OWNERS): move inactive maintainers to emeritus approvers

[jasondellaluce]

What type of PR is this?

/kind documentation

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

What this PR does / why we need it:

For falcosecurity/evolution#157 (see: falcosecurity/evolution#157), this PR proposes to move to emeritus_approvers maintainers that have been inactive in the past 6 months, as for our governance (see: https://github.com/falcosecurity/.github/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md#project-inactivity). Maintainers are invited to have a discussion and take a decision.

cc @falcosecurity/community-maintainers

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

[poiana]

@jasondellaluce: The label(s) kind/documentation cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind documentation

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

What this PR does / why we need it:

For falcosecurity/evolution#157 (see: falcosecurity/evolution#157), this PR proposes to move to emeritus_approvers maintainers that have been inactive in the past 6 months, as for our governance (see: https://github.com/falcosecurity/.github/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md#project-inactivity). Maintainers are invited to have a discussion and take a decision.

cc @falcosecurity/community-maintainers

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[leogr]

Although this repository has not required much involvement, I'm ok with moving those owners to emeritus approvers because they egregiously served the Falco project in the past, but now it seems they don't have time anymore.

However, I don't feel comfortable remaining the only approver on the list. So I want to call in this discussion some other active maintainers I know have been very present in the community.

@araujof @terylt @cpanato @maxgio92 @Issif @dwindsor: Is anyone willing to step up as a maintainer of this repository? 🤗

Ofc, the invite is also open to any maintainer interested in managing this repo 😃

[Issif]

I'll propose myself as maintainer in a next community call if people agree

[Andreagit97]

Hey @leogr if you need help, I can do it! Let me know if you need it :)

[terylt]

I'm happy to help maintain this if you want.

[maxgio92]

I'm happy to help here too @leogr. At the same time, as community calls are one of the best places where the whole community meets IMHO, and I join them infrequently, I don't see I match the duties of a potential community maintainer.

[araujof]

@leogr same here, if you guys need one more pair of hands, I volunteer to help :)

[leogr]

Hey @jasondellaluce,

Could you apply my suggested change (see below) please? Thank you 🙏

Then I believe we are mostly done here.

[leogr]

This change LGTM since:

• people moved to emeritus_approvers have been inactive but also
  • decided to step down,
  • have not shown interest in maintaining this repo,
  • are unreachable,
  • or already left the organization;
• new people added to approvers
  • are already maintainers of other projects
  • have been involved in the community;
• this is a special repo, but it does not require much maintenance, and no particular requirements are needed.

I've added the wip: prefix (i.e. work in progress) to this PR to make clear that the current proposed change is not yet a definitive decision. So, I leave this open another couple of days in case there's other feedback. However, you can still propose changes even after this PR gets merged.

[poiana]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: aad43639fe1cdc2d73e3da07441b239979fdade5

[poiana]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jasondellaluce, leogr

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [leogr]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment