Implementation of TOMAS in GCHP #252
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This PR supersedes #221. |
This was referenced Nov 11, 2022
msulprizio
approved these changes
Nov 14, 2022
Signed-off-by: Melissa Sulprizio <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Melissa Sulprizio <[email protected]>
3 tasks
4 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the PR adding TOMAS simulations in GCHP. It supersedes #221 originally from @BettyCroft. This PR should be merged along with:
I have test run the merge on a single node simulation, and it's completed successfully.