Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems sensitive to subtle changes; e.g. a minor change in the bug template could break the
18
positioning and would be difficult to debug. Perhaps a.matchAll
with URL parsing would work more consistently for the long-term: https://github.com/googleapis/google-cloud-node/pull/5460/files#r1637082948There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
True - not ideal. However your solution would fail (pass?) for the same reason, i.e., it would catch github links in the template. I think, ultimately, we need to check the input value itself. Ideally github would provide a JSON-like object for their yaml templates, especially since they support
required
fields.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, seems like a feature request: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/63402#discussioncomment-6697333