-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
helm: release a new helm charts to use k8s service for discover query-scheduler replicas #9477
helm: release a new helm charts to use k8s service for discover query-scheduler replicas #9477
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@@ -207,6 +207,16 @@ loki: | |||
index_gateway: | |||
{{- tpl (. | toYaml) $ | nindent 4 }} | |||
{{- end }} | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we add a TODO or some other note here to remove this section once we bump the Loki version?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you think about continuing to use k8s service for service discovery? I am going to merge this PR, for now, to get the fix out. I will take care of the feedback in PR #9471 if you think we should move back to ring-based service discovery.
@@ -302,6 +312,10 @@ loki: | |||
# -- Optional index gateway configuration | |||
index_gateway: | |||
mode: ring | |||
frontend: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alternatively we could add the comment here to set these to empty objects when we bump the Loki version.
…-scheduler replicas (grafana#9477) **What this PR does / why we need it**: Currently, we have a bug in our code when running Loki in SSD mode and using the ring for query-scheduler discovery. It causes queries to not be distributed to all the available read pods. I have explained the issue in detail in [the PR which fixes the code](grafana#9471). Since this bug causes a major query performance impact and code release might take time, in this PR we are doing a new helm release which fixes the issue by using the k8s service for discovering `query-scheduler` replicas. **Which issue(s) this PR fixes**: Fixes grafana#9195
…-scheduler replicas (grafana#9477) **What this PR does / why we need it**: Currently, we have a bug in our code when running Loki in SSD mode and using the ring for query-scheduler discovery. It causes queries to not be distributed to all the available read pods. I have explained the issue in detail in [the PR which fixes the code](grafana#9471). Since this bug causes a major query performance impact and code release might take time, in this PR we are doing a new helm release which fixes the issue by using the k8s service for discovering `query-scheduler` replicas. **Which issue(s) this PR fixes**: Fixes grafana#9195
What this PR does / why we need it:
Currently, we have a bug in our code when running Loki in SSD mode and using the ring for query-scheduler discovery. It causes queries to not be distributed to all the available read pods. I have explained the issue in detail in the PR which fixes the code.
Since this bug causes a major query performance impact and code release might take time, in this PR we are doing a new helm release which fixes the issue by using the k8s service for discovering
query-scheduler
replicas.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #9195