Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update SwiftProtobuf to 1.5.0 #440

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 18, 2019
Merged

Conversation

rebello95
Copy link
Collaborator

Updates SwiftProtobuf to 1.5.0, which brings full support for Swift 5.

After building/running on this branch, no warnings are emitted with Swift 5 mode.

Updates SwiftProtobuf to 1.5.0, which brings full support for Swift 5.

After building/running on this branch, no warnings are emitted with Swift 5 mode.
@rebello95 rebello95 requested review from timburks and MrMage April 18, 2019 00:56
@MrMage
Copy link
Collaborator

MrMage commented Apr 18, 2019

The test failure looks like a flake :-(

@MrMage MrMage closed this Apr 18, 2019
@MrMage MrMage reopened this Apr 18, 2019
@MrMage
Copy link
Collaborator

MrMage commented Apr 18, 2019

Looks like testMultipleConnectivityObserversAreCalled is flaky.

@rebello95
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Updated the timeout to see if this fixes the issue - haven't been able to get the test to fail locally :/

@rebello95
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Looks promising, only one failed this time because of an unknown error. Re-running

@rebello95 rebello95 closed this Apr 18, 2019
@rebello95 rebello95 reopened this Apr 18, 2019
@MrMage
Copy link
Collaborator

MrMage commented Apr 18, 2019

See also #441, which unfortunately is still flaky.

@rebello95
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Yea I commented on it this morning, looks like it's failing for a different reason there though

@rebello95 rebello95 merged commit 2d822f1 into grpc:master Apr 18, 2019
@rebello95 rebello95 deleted the swiftprotobuf-1.5.0 branch April 18, 2019 17:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants