Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ignore file with generated blake2b hashes #725

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2016

Conversation

jtimberman
Copy link
Contributor

In commit 122f1b0, we started generating the blake2b checksums of all files in a package to a file in the plan's directory. We should ignore this.

Signed-off-by: jtimberman [email protected]

In commit 122f1b0, we started generating the blake2b checksums of all
files in a package to a file in the plan's directory. We should ignore
this.

Signed-off-by: jtimberman <[email protected]>
@thesentinels
Copy link
Contributor

By analyzing the blame information on this pull request, we identified @fnichol, @adamhjk, @metadave, @smith and @reset to be potential reviewers

@smith
Copy link
Contributor

smith commented Jun 10, 2016

@thesentinels r+

So will this generate these files in everybody's plan directory on different repos? Seems kind of impolite; could we store them somewhere less obtrusive or clean up after ourselves?

tumblr_np4r3jwb0d1tq9q5vo1_400

@thesentinels
Copy link
Contributor

📌 Commit 47263c3 has been approved by smith

@fnichol
Copy link
Collaborator

fnichol commented Jun 10, 2016

@jtimberman The right solution here is to write that file into $HAB_CACHE_SRC_PATH/$pkg_dirname and then it's left as a build time file. We shouldn't be working or writing into the $PLAN_CONTEXT

@thesentinels
Copy link
Contributor

⌛ Testing commit 47263c3 with merge 1703723...

thesentinels pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2016
In commit 122f1b0, we started generating the blake2b checksums of all
files in a package to a file in the plan's directory. We should ignore
this.

Signed-off-by: jtimberman <[email protected]>

Pull request: #725
Approved by: smith
@thesentinels
Copy link
Contributor

☀️ Test successful - travis

@thesentinels thesentinels merged commit 47263c3 into master Jun 10, 2016
@reset reset deleted the jtimberman/ignore-hashes-list branch June 10, 2016 23:14
@reset
Copy link
Collaborator

reset commented Jun 10, 2016

@fnichol absolutely, are you gonna tend that that fix or should @jtimberman?

@fnichol
Copy link
Collaborator

fnichol commented Jun 10, 2016

I can pick this up if no fixes come in before I start rebuilding

@fnichol
Copy link
Collaborator

fnichol commented Jun 11, 2016

I've got this

fnichol added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2016
This change addresses 2 issues:

* The file that contains the cryptographic hashes to be stored in the
  `FILES` metadata file needs to be created under the source cache, not
  in the `$PLAN_CONTEXT` directory.
* The `$HAB_BIN` variable must be used throughout the program and not
  the `$_hab_cmd` variable, who's role has been downplayed.

References #725

Signed-off-by: Fletcher Nichol <[email protected]>
fnichol added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2016
This change addresses 2 issues:

* The file that contains the cryptographic hashes to be stored in the
  `FILES` metadata file needs to be created under the source cache, not
  in the `$PLAN_CONTEXT` directory.
* The `$HAB_BIN` variable must be used throughout the program and not
  the `$_hab_cmd` variable, who's role has been downplayed.

References #725

Signed-off-by: Fletcher Nichol <[email protected]>
thesentinels pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2016
This change addresses 2 issues:

* The file that contains the cryptographic hashes to be stored in the
  `FILES` metadata file needs to be created under the source cache, not
  in the `$PLAN_CONTEXT` directory.
* The `$HAB_BIN` variable must be used throughout the program and not
  the `$_hab_cmd` variable, who's role has been downplayed.

References #725

Signed-off-by: Fletcher Nichol <[email protected]>

Pull request: #743
Approved by: fnichol
jtimberman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2016
In commit 122f1b0, we started generating the blake2b checksums of all
files in a package to a file in the plan's directory. We should ignore
this.

Signed-off-by: jtimberman <[email protected]>

Pull request: #725
Approved by: smith
jtimberman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2016
This change addresses 2 issues:

* The file that contains the cryptographic hashes to be stored in the
  `FILES` metadata file needs to be created under the source cache, not
  in the `$PLAN_CONTEXT` directory.
* The `$HAB_BIN` variable must be used throughout the program and not
  the `$_hab_cmd` variable, who's role has been downplayed.

References #725

Signed-off-by: Fletcher Nichol <[email protected]>

Pull request: #743
Approved by: fnichol
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants