Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[uss_qualifier] acces proper activity result field in down_uss.py #731

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2024

Conversation

Shastick
Copy link
Contributor

@Shastick Shastick commented Jul 15, 2024

Read the correct field when running the check for the planned activity's result.

(The only field with result in its name is activity_result and using that field seems to fix the original purpose of the code).

This should fix #730

Now, I'm unsure why we did not catch this via the CI runs: DownUSS is configured to run as part of the f3548_21.yaml suite which is included in multiple scenario configurations.

I assume we're not covering a particular corner case, but I won't look into this further until we have a quick chat about it in the next weekly meeting.

Read the correct field when running the check for the planned activity's result
@Shastick Shastick force-pushed the down-uss-result-fix branch from 416d50e to 1b61242 Compare July 15, 2024 10:18
Copy link
Contributor

@barroco barroco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Thanks for taking care of it. This test is currently not run by the CI. It requires the role of utm.conformance_monitoring_sa to create off-nominal operations as described here which is missing. @Shastick Could you please create an issue so we can track it?

@barroco barroco merged commit e82cbf6 into interuss:main Jul 15, 2024
20 checks passed
github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2024
Read the correct field when running the check for the planned activity's result e82cbf6
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants