Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(parental-leave): Amend condition for other parent approval #16050

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

ylfahfa
Copy link
Member

@ylfahfa ylfahfa commented Sep 18, 2024

Other parent approval allowed for start date in current month

What

Allow other parent to approve transfer of rights if start date is in current month rather than after current date.

To be the same as in employer approval

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced validation for parental leave start dates to ensure they are not in the past relative to the end of the last month.
    • Updated logic prevents submission of invalid dates for parental leave applications.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved warning message conditions for better user guidance on date selection.

@ylfahfa ylfahfa requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2024 10:48
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the OtherParentApproval.ts file, specifically enhancing the logic for displaying warnings and enabling the submit button based on the parental leave start date. The implementation now uses a utility function to compare the start date against the last day of the previous month, ensuring that the start date is valid and not in the past.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
libs/application/templates/parental-leave/src/forms/OtherParentApproval.ts Modified logic for displaying warnings and enabling the submit button based on the start date of parental leave, utilizing getLastDayOfLastMonth for comparisons.
../lib/parentalLeaveUtils Added utility function getLastDayOfLastMonth.

Suggested labels

automerge, high priority

Suggested reviewers

  • ylfahfa

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Tip

Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI o1 for code reviews: OpenAI's new o1 model is being tested for code reviews. This model has advanced reasoning capabilities and can provide more nuanced feedback on your code.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.

@ylfahfa ylfahfa added the deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Sep 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
libs/application/templates/parental-leave/src/forms/OtherParentApproval.ts (1)

15-18: Ensure consistent import statements for better tree-shaking

When importing functions from '../lib/parentalLeaveUtils', ensure that only the necessary functions are imported to optimize bundling and enable effective tree-shaking.

If getApplicationAnswers and getLastDayOfLastMonth are the only functions required, the import statement is appropriate. Otherwise, consider importing only the needed functions.

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 825530d and d28d1be.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/application/templates/parental-leave/src/forms/OtherParentApproval.ts (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
libs/application/templates/parental-leave/src/forms/OtherParentApproval.ts (1)

Pattern libs/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • Reusability of components and hooks across different NextJS apps.
  • TypeScript usage for defining props and exporting types.
  • Effective tree-shaking and bundling practices."

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs 5372c8a 🔗

6 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 6 Passed
🔻 Test Sessions change in coverage: 2 decreased, 10 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.99s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 111 2 3m 15.16s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 109 0 1m 51.75s 1 decreased (-0.01%) Link
application-templates-parental-leave 0 0 0 162 0 20.01s 1 decreased (-0.05%) Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 35.72s 1 no change Link
web 0 0 0 84 0 33.75s 1 no change Link

🔻 Code Coverage Decreases vs Default Branch (2)

  • application-templates-parental-leave - jest 35.41% (-0.05%) - Details
  • application-template-api-modules - jest 25.56% (-0.01%) - Details

Copy link
Member

@veronikasif veronikasif left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm 👍

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 36.75%. Comparing base (0421bfe) to head (60fce3e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...es/parental-leave/src/forms/OtherParentApproval.ts 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #16050      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   36.73%   36.75%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6735     6735              
  Lines      138232   138213      -19     
  Branches    39302    39293       -9     
==========================================
+ Hits        50784    50796      +12     
+ Misses      87448    87417      -31     
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.39% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 41.64% <ø> (ø)
application-template-api-modules 23.45% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
application-templates-parental-leave 30.15% <0.00%> (-0.05%) ⬇️
application-ui-shell 21.29% <ø> (ø)
web 1.85% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...es/parental-leave/src/forms/OtherParentApproval.ts 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0421bfe...60fce3e. Read the comment docs.

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit a97a7fe into main Sep 18, 2024
44 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the fix/pl-allow-other-parent-approval-in-current-month branch September 18, 2024 13:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deprecated:automerge (Disabled) Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants