chore(j-s): Delete indictments before launch #16536
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16536 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 36.79% 36.80% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 6854 6852 -2
Lines 142218 141976 -242
Branches 40555 40457 -98
==========================================
- Hits 52326 52257 -69
+ Misses 89892 89719 -173
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. see 35 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 21286 Passed, 0 Skipped, 19m 4.05s Total Time |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new migration file for a Sequelize-based application that updates the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241023133561-update-case.js (1)
1-2: Remove redundant 'use strict' directiveThe 'use strict' directive is unnecessary in ES modules as they are strict by default.
-'use strict'🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241023133561-update-case.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241023133561-update-case.js (1)
Pattern
apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🪛 Biome
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241023133561-update-case.js
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241023133561-update-case.js (1)
1-18: Verify impact on application logicThis migration permanently deletes indictment cases. Let's verify there are no dependencies or business logic that might be affected.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about how DELETED state is handled in the codebase.
Migration appears safe - DELETED state is an established end state
The verification shows that:
- The DELETED state is already used in the system for both INDICTMENT and non-INDICTMENT cases (evidenced by migration 20230629173643)
- Existing queries properly handle DELETED state in WHERE clauses alongside other terminal states like ACCEPTED and REJECTED
- The migration only affects INDICTMENT cases created before a specific date, maintaining system consistency
The change follows established patterns for case state management and doesn't introduce new states or unexpected behavior.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to INDICTMENT cases in the codebase echo "Searching for INDICTMENT type usage..." rg -l "INDICTMENT" --type ts --type js echo "\nSearching for state === 'DELETED' conditions..." rg "state.*===.*['\"]DELETED['\"]" --type ts --type js echo "\nSearching for potential case type enum definitions..." ast-grep --pattern 'enum CaseType { $$$ INDICTMENT $$$ }'Length of output: 11438
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for case state enum/type definitions echo "Searching for case state definitions..." ast-grep --pattern 'enum CaseState { $$$ DELETED $$$ }' # Search for state transitions and business logic around DELETED state echo "\nSearching for state transition logic..." rg -A 5 "state.*=.*['\"]DELETED['\"]" --type ts --type js # Search for queries or filters that might be affected echo "\nSearching for case queries and filters..." rg "WHERE.*state" --type jsLength of output: 3409
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 1-1: Redundant use strict directive.
The entire contents of JavaScript modules are automatically in strict mode, with no statement needed to initiate it.
Safe fix: Remove the redundant use strict directive.(lint/suspicious/noRedundantUseStrict)
What
Clean up indictment cases before launch
Why
So we don't have any old ones hanging around that are in wrong states
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes