fix(j-s): Migration #16742
fix(j-s): Migration #16742
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to a migration script for the judicial system's database. Specifically, the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241101152701-correct-appealed-cases.js (1)
Line range hint
8-50: Consider consolidating the bulkUpdate operationsThe current implementation uses multiple bulkUpdate operations for similar changes. This could be simplified into fewer operations by grouping cases that require the same field updates.
Consider refactoring to something like this:
- queryInterface.bulkUpdate( - 'case', - { prosecutor_postponed_appeal_date: null }, - { - id: [ - '7ee802fa-cfcd-48e6-b198-ea6c53a2ddd0', - '133b1a36-e4c3-42d6-8293-0bd57bddc40b', - '0e1dd971-8958-4e2e-9c81-940c2bd10909', - ], - }, - { transaction }, - ), - // ... other individual updates ... + // Group 1: Cases that need all fields nullified + queryInterface.bulkUpdate( + 'case', + { + appeal_state: null, + prosecutor_postponed_appeal_date: null, + accused_postponed_appeal_date: null, + }, + { + id: [ + 'd909a866-7ed0-45ed-86c1-2445a7475e4e', + '798e8e75-e853-48b3-a15d-1fbfcd018f98' + ], + }, + { transaction }, + ), + // Group 2: Cases that need only prosecutor_postponed_appeal_date nullified + queryInterface.bulkUpdate( + 'case', + { prosecutor_postponed_appeal_date: null }, + { + id: [ + '7ee802fa-cfcd-48e6-b198-ea6c53a2ddd0', + '133b1a36-e4c3-42d6-8293-0bd57bddc40b', + '0e1dd971-8958-4e2e-9c81-940c2bd10909', + ], + }, + { transaction }, + ),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241101152701-correct-appealed-cases.js(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241101152701-correct-appealed-cases.js (1)
Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241101152701-correct-appealed-cases.js (1)
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#16495
File: apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241022142128-update-defendant.js:18-24
Timestamp: 2024-10-25T14:06:40.795Z
Learning: When rolling back migrations, if the associated code that uses the fields is also rolled back, data preservation concerns may not be an issue.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241101152701-correct-appealed-cases.js (3)
Line range hint 4-8: Well-structured migration with proper transaction handling!
The migration follows best practices by using a transaction and Promise.all for atomic execution of multiple updates.
Line range hint 52-54: Verify if empty down migration is intentional
The down migration is empty, which means these changes cannot be rolled back. Based on previous learnings, this might be acceptable if the associated code changes are also rolled back, but please confirm if this is intentional.
Let's check if there are any dependent changes:
✅ Verification successful
Empty down migration is acceptable in this case
This migration is specifically correcting data issues by nullifying incorrect values in specific cases (identified by UUIDs). Since this is a data cleanup migration fixing invalid states, having an empty down migration is appropriate because:
- The migration only affects a fixed set of cases with specific UUIDs
- The changes reset invalid data to
nullrather than transforming valid data - The fields being modified (
prosecutor_postponed_appeal_date,accused_postponed_appeal_date,appeal_state) are still actively used in the codebase for appeal handling
Attempting to restore potentially invalid data would be more risky than helpful.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for related code changes that might depend on these column names
# Expected: Should show any code references to these fields
echo "Checking for code references to the affected fields..."
rg -l "prosecutor_postponed_appeal_date|accused_postponed_appeal_date|appeal_state" \
--type ts \
--type js \
-g '!**/migrations/*'
Length of output: 561
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of these files to understand the usage
echo "=== Checking notifications.ts ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "prosecutor_postponed_appeal_date|accused_postponed_appeal_date|appeal_state" "apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/messages/notifications.ts"
echo -e "\n=== Checking cases.filter.ts ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "prosecutor_postponed_appeal_date|accused_postponed_appeal_date|appeal_state" "apps/judicial-system/backend/src/app/modules/case/filters/cases.filter.ts"
echo -e "\n=== Checking useAppealAlertBanner.strings.ts ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "prosecutor_postponed_appeal_date|accused_postponed_appeal_date|appeal_state" "apps/judicial-system/web/src/utils/hooks/useAppealAlertBanner/useAppealAlertBanner.strings.ts"
# Also let's check the migration file to understand what's being changed
echo -e "\n=== Checking the migration file ==="
cat "apps/judicial-system/backend/migrations/20241101152701-correct-appealed-cases.js"
Length of output: 4721
9-9: Verify the impact of setting all values to null
The migration sets multiple appeal-related fields to null across different cases. This could potentially lead to data loss if these fields currently contain important information.
Let's check the current values before proceeding:
Also applies to: 22-22, 30-31, 41-43
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 21195 Passed, 0 Skipped, 0s Total Time |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #16742 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 36.54% 36.54%
=======================================
Files 6890 6890
Lines 143640 143640
Branches 40926 40926
=======================================
Hits 52488 52488
Misses 91152 91152
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Migration
What
Why
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit