Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix some struct names in comment #6253

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

longxiangqiao
Copy link
Contributor

@longxiangqiao longxiangqiao commented Nov 25, 2024

Which problem is this PR solving?

Description of the changes

fix some struct names in comment

How was this change tested?

No need

Checklist

@longxiangqiao longxiangqiao requested a review from a team as a code owner November 25, 2024 15:46
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.42%. Comparing base (4d1c7d8) to head (23ad8fb).
Report is 99 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6253       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   48.76%   96.42%   +47.66%     
===========================================
  Files         179      355      +176     
  Lines       10803    20150     +9347     
===========================================
+ Hits         5268    19430    +14162     
+ Misses       5092      531     -4561     
+ Partials      443      189      -254     
Flag Coverage Δ
badger_v1 8.31% <ø> (ø)
badger_v2 1.67% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v1 14.39% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2 1.61% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v1 14.39% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2 1.61% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-6.x-v1 18.59% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-7.x-v1 18.68% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v1 18.85% <ø> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v2 1.67% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
grpc_v1 9.44% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v2 6.98% <ø> (ø)
kafka-v1 8.88% <ø> (ø)
kafka-v2 1.67% <ø> (ø)
memory_v2 1.67% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-1.x-v1 18.73% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v1 18.73% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v2 1.66% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
tailsampling-processor 0.46% <ø> (ø)
unittests 95.33% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@yurishkuro yurishkuro added the changelog:skip Trivial change that does not require an entry in CHANGELOG label Dec 3, 2024
@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member

unresolved conflicts, feel free to resubmit.

@longxiangqiao
Copy link
Contributor Author

fix some struct names in comment

Thanks. The new pr #6509.

yurishkuro pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2025
<!--
!! Please DELETE this comment before posting.
We appreciate your contribution to the Jaeger project! 👋🎉
-->

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- <!-- Example: Resolves #123 -->

## Description of the changes

fix some struct names in comment

resubmit for #6253 and
#6509

## How was this change tested?
- 

## Checklist
- [ ] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [ ] I have signed all commits
- [ ] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [ ] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

Signed-off-by: longxiangqiao <[email protected]>
mahadzaryab1 pushed a commit to mahadzaryab1/jaeger that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2025
<!--
!! Please DELETE this comment before posting.
We appreciate your contribution to the Jaeger project! 👋🎉
-->

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- <!-- Example: Resolves jaegertracing#123 -->

## Description of the changes

fix some struct names in comment

resubmit for jaegertracing#6253 and
jaegertracing#6509

## How was this change tested?
- 

## Checklist
- [ ] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [ ] I have signed all commits
- [ ] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [ ] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

Signed-off-by: longxiangqiao <[email protected]>
ekefan pushed a commit to ekefan/jaeger that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2025
<!--
!! Please DELETE this comment before posting.
We appreciate your contribution to the Jaeger project! 👋🎉
-->

## Which problem is this PR solving?
- <!-- Example: Resolves jaegertracing#123 -->

## Description of the changes

fix some struct names in comment

resubmit for jaegertracing#6253 and
jaegertracing#6509

## How was this change tested?
- 

## Checklist
- [ ] I have read
https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
- [ ] I have signed all commits
- [ ] I have added unit tests for the new functionality
- [ ] I have run lint and test steps successfully
  - for `jaeger`: `make lint test`
  - for `jaeger-ui`: `npm run lint` and `npm run test`

Signed-off-by: longxiangqiao <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog:skip Trivial change that does not require an entry in CHANGELOG
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants