Geiger sensor #144
Merged
Geiger sensor #144
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Geiger first test version
…into geiger_sensor
…nto geiger_sensor
…6 fixed moving-sum evaluation in case geigerEvaluate() is called w/ a freq < 1Hz
…xpected) when the IRQ is configured for triggering on the falling edges.
…a Schmitt Trigger (SN74LVC1G17) between CAJOE and ESP32: code cleanup.
Moving sum feature
…into geiger_sensor
…nto geiger_sensor
…nto geiger_sensor
hpsaturn
commented
Jul 6, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Support for Geiger sensor CAJOE
Tests
Credits
Thanks to @roberbike @iw2lsi for the tests and first implementation.