Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show actual values in info messages #1453

Closed
wants to merge 64 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

dbrnz
Copy link
Contributor

@dbrnz dbrnz commented Nov 9, 2018

No description provided.

This is just a preliminary, hacky implementation.
@AndreMiras
Copy link
Member

I agree this is a good improvement, but I worry this could conflict with the soon to be merged #1412
So I prefer to put on hold before merging if you don't mind.

@dbrnz
Copy link
Contributor Author

dbrnz commented Nov 9, 2018

That's fine -- I'll update the patch after #1412 goes in.

AndreMiras and others added 10 commits November 9, 2018 16:01
C++ recipe didn't set all instances of `ctx.ndk_dir` in format string
Protobuf has been updated to 3.5.1, it's not the last version (3.6.1)
because last version cause trouble during compilation and needs more
work.

This patch also fixes the issue with hardcoded local path for protoc which
could not work. Protobuf needs a version of "protoc" (its compiler, used
to produce .py file from .proto files) compiled for the host platform.
Official binaries for protoc are available, the recipe will download the
one suitable for host and use it.
If the platform is not supported, building may still work if the right "protoc"
is available in search path.
[protobuf_cpp] Updated to Protobuf 3.5.1 + fixed protoc issue
[cffi] Updated recipe to last cffi version (1.11.5)
@AndreMiras
Copy link
Member

Hi @dbrnz #1412 just got merged so you can rebase your changes on it.

Also just wondering if we could simplify the "wording" further by replacing:

info('Found Android API target in $ANDROIDAPI: it is {}'.format(android_api))

By directly:

info('Found Android API target in $ANDROIDAPI: {}'.format(android_api))

So skipping the "it is" part in each case. And we can also probably skip the line break (if tox doesn't mind).
It's just a suggestion, but what do you think?

@dbrnz
Copy link
Contributor Author

dbrnz commented Nov 10, 2018

Hmm, my attempt at rebasing has pulled in all of #1412's patches... I'm closing this PR and will create a new one (#1458) that has just my stuff. And yes to removing the "it is" (another similar message had "it is" so copied the wording...).

@dbrnz dbrnz closed this Nov 10, 2018
@dbrnz dbrnz deleted the improve_messages branch November 10, 2018 21:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants