-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add dates to the 1.5 release timeline #538
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Anna Jung (VMware) <[email protected]>
/hold until review from the community @kimwnasptd will send out an email to the mailing list to increase visibility of the proposed timeline and share during the Nov 23rd community meeting to gather feedback |
Signed-off-by: Anna Jung (VMware) <[email protected]>
@annajung maybe I missed it, but can you link me to where the release team for 1.5 was decided? For example, here was the voting issue for Kubeflow 1.4's release team: EDIT: I have put an item on the next community meeting agenda to discuss forming the Kubeflow 1.5 release team. |
The release team went over this with the community and WGs in the 1.4 release retro https://github.com/kubeflow/community/blob/master/releases/retrospectives/release-1.4.md. We will be following what K8s does, where the leads are choosing the next leads. We've sent an email to the list as well to get more people to be part of the release, join the meetings and follow the process. Nominations happened for 1.4 because there was no Release Team previously, but now we have both a handbook/process and defined roles. |
To follow up, I have raised my concerns about how this release team was formed in: #540 |
I'd like to draw the attention of the WGs to this issue and get some feedback. This is the timeline we had discussed and proposed for 1.5. What are your thoughts? Do you have any concerns? cc @kubeflow/wg-automl-leads NOTE: Let's keep this discussion and communication in parallel with the formation of the release team, and not have one block on the other. cc @annajung @jbottum @shannonbradshaw @DomFleischmann @DnPlas @js-ts |
I think let's allow the new release team to decide on the dates, and not force anything on them. |
The 1.5 release team has been finalized and would like to suggest we move forward with the release timeline. Important notes:
Please take a look at the proposed timeline and provide your feedback, thank you! |
@yuzisun @animeshsingh @pvaneck this is our tracking issue for the 1.5 timeline. How does this sound to you? We will finalize this schedule on Friday 17th of December and merge this PR then. |
@kimwnasptd We are good with the schedule, are you going to cover the KServe webapp testing? |
@yuzisun yes, I'll ensure the version of the KServe web app will be working as expected with the version of KServe that will be included. Thanks for confirming as well! Since there are no concerns raised for the above timeline we will go forth and finalize it. Happy to discuss if anything unexpected turns up though. We will also send an email in the mailing list to announce this finalized schedule. /lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: annajung, kimwnasptd The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/hold cancel |
@kimwnasptd @annajung we should update this timeline with the updated dates |
@jbottum It's been updated #549 by @kimwnasptd |
Signed-off-by: Anna Jung (VMware) [email protected]
Based on the release team meeting on Nov. 22nd, the release team proposes the following dates for the 1.5 release.
Important dates are outlined below:
Note: All release phases have increased 2 weeks to accommodate for the end of the year holiday season. 1.5 release will be 19 weeks instead of 17 weeks
cc @kimwnasptd @jbottum @shannonbradshaw