-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sig-cluster-lifecycle: Standard for communicating a local registry #1755
Comments
/sig cluster-lifeycle |
@nicks: The label(s) In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/sig cluster-lifecycle |
Added the |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
lets close this to silence the bots and if we want to revisit we can reopen. |
Thanks @neolit123 ! Ya, I consider this basically implemented. Microk8s and Kind both advertise this format now, and Tilt reads it. There are open issues for other providers/consumers to support it. |
Enhancement Description
Please to keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team track efficiently the evolution of the enhancement
This is a proposal for a standard way that cluster configuration tools should publicize a local registry to app-developer tools.
kubernetes-sigs/kind#1543
The proposal does not require any code changes to Kubernetes. But because it requires agreement on a common standard, sig-cluster-lifecycle suggested using the KEP process to build consensus on the proposal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: