Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

cmd/kube-controller-manager: Remove inactive members from OWNERS #99077

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

cmd/kube-controller-manager: Remove inactive members from OWNERS #99077

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mrbobbytables
Copy link
Member

ref: kubernetes/org#2456

As a part of cleaning up inactive members (those with no activity within
the past 18 months) from OWNERS files, this commit removes gmarek,
madhusudancs, and nikhiljindal from reviewers.

/kind cleanup

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

@mrbobbytables
cmd/kube-controller-manager: Remove inactive members from OWNERS
200ded7 
As a part of cleaning up inactive members (those with no activity within
the past 18 months) from OWNERS files, this commit removes gmarek,
madhusudancs, and nikhiljindal from reviewers.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Feb 14, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mrbobbytables
To complete the pull request process, please assign lavalamp after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @lavalamp in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Feb 14, 2021
@mrbobbytables
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@nikhita nikhita mentioned this pull request Feb 16, 2021
Merged
@nikhita
Copy link
Member

nikhita commented Feb 16, 2021

Created #99110 to remove all inactive members in a single PR, closing this PR.

@nikhita nikhita closed this Feb 16, 2021
@fedebongio
Copy link
Contributor

/triage accepted

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Feb 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@caesarxuchao caesarxuchao Awaiting requested review from caesarxuchao

@mml mml Awaiting requested review from mml

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@mrbobbytables @k8s-ci-robot @nikhita @fedebongio