Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2024. It is now read-only.

[Merged by Bors] - chore(*): add mathlib4 synchronization comments #17754

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Nov 29, 2022

Regenerated from the port status wiki page.
Relates to the following PRs:


The following files have no module docstring, so I have not added a message in this PR

Please make a PR to add a module docstring (for Lean3 and Lean4!), then I will add the freeze comment next time.


I am a bot; please check that I have not put a comment in a bad place before running bors merge!
If the PRs above don't match the file they are listed after, that means the port status page is wrong.

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. mathlib4-synchronization This PR *only* adds a message to the module doc about synchronization with mathlib4 labels Nov 29, 2022

> THIS FILE IS SYNCHRONIZED WITH MATHLIB4.
> https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/764
> Any changes to this file require a corresponding PR to mathlib4.-/
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, looks like I need to teach it to add a line break

@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the create-pull-request/patch branch 2 times, most recently from e2ae3c1 to 99b167d Compare November 29, 2022 23:00
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the create-pull-request/patch branch from 99b167d to b7d9937 Compare December 1, 2022 11:21
@eric-wieser
Copy link
Member

bors merge

@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Dec 1, 2022

👎 Rejected by label

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Dec 1, 2022
@eric-wieser eric-wieser added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR and removed ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) not-ready-to-merge labels Dec 1, 2022
@eric-wieser
Copy link
Member

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Dec 1, 2022
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2022
Regenerated from the [port status wiki page](https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/wiki/mathlib4-port-status).
Relates to the following PRs:
* `algebra.field.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#668
* `algebra.group.commute`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#750
* `algebra.group_with_zero.commute`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#762
* `algebra.group_with_zero.semiconj`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#757
* `algebra.group_with_zero.units.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#735
* `algebra.hom.embedding`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#764
* `algebra.order.monoid.cancel.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#774
* `algebra.order.monoid.canonical.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#778
* `algebra.order.monoid.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#771
* `algebra.order.monoid.min_max`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#763
* `algebra.order.monoid.order_dual`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#786
* `algebra.order.sub.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#732
* `algebra.regular.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#758
* `algebra.ring.commute`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#759
* `algebra.ring.regular`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#795
* `algebra.ring.semiconj`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#751
* `control.applicative`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#798
* `control.functor`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#612
* `control.monad.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#752
* `data.countable.defs`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#736
* `data.int.units`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#807
* `data.nat.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#729
* `data.nat.psub`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#806
* `data.nat.units`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#805
* `data.pi.algebra`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#564
* `data.prod.lex`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#783
* `logic.embedding.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#700
* `logic.equiv.option`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#674
* `order.bounded_order`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#697
* `order.with_bot`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#776
* `order.disjoint`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#773
* `order.min_max`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#728
* `order.prop_instances`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#792
* `order.rel_iso.basic`: leanprover-community/mathlib4#772
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Dec 1, 2022

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title chore(*): add mathlib4 synchronization comments [Merged by Bors] - chore(*): add mathlib4 synchronization comments Dec 1, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Dec 1, 2022
@bors bors bot deleted the create-pull-request/patch branch December 1, 2022 16:53
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. mathlib4-synchronization This PR *only* adds a message to the module doc about synchronization with mathlib4 ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants