Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LurkField + refactor quickcheck -> proptest #240

Merged
merged 29 commits into from
Feb 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

johnchandlerburnham
Copy link
Contributor

This PR merges #229 on top of #239, which changes some details of what #229 tests

@johnchandlerburnham johnchandlerburnham changed the title LurkField + refactor quickcheck -> proptest WIP: LurkField + refactor quickcheck -> proptest Feb 1, 2023
@johnchandlerburnham johnchandlerburnham changed the base branch from master to jcb/lurk_ff February 2, 2023 03:57
@johnchandlerburnham johnchandlerburnham changed the title WIP: LurkField + refactor quickcheck -> proptest LurkField + refactor quickcheck -> proptest Feb 2, 2023
@porcuquine porcuquine requested a review from huitseeker February 8, 2023 00:43
@porcuquine
Copy link
Contributor

This seems fine to me. Once #239 merges, we could also merge this to master (base branch should change on merge) with @huitseeker's approval.

Base automatically changed from jcb/lurk_ff to master February 8, 2023 01:11
Copy link
Contributor

@huitseeker huitseeker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is ok in the sense that it’s a conservative tweak of #229, so I’m of course very positive on getting this in, modulo the tweak on the Arbitrary for field elements (which I trust @johnchandlerburnham to fix before merge).

The next missing step is to better exploit derivation of Arbitrary, but we can definitely do that in a second pass.

src/field.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/field.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
@johnchandlerburnham
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like we have an issue with the WASM build that just got merged, because proptest doesn't compile to WASM: proptest-rs/proptest#137

@porcuquine porcuquine merged commit 1b55fd2 into master Feb 8, 2023
@porcuquine porcuquine deleted the jcb/proptest branch February 8, 2023 06:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants