You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For a NatCap project, we have a 30m DEM of Colombia that is resulting in disjointed streams. When a single watershed within Colombia is used instead, the streams are contiguous, as we expect.
I dug into this a bit more and the root cause appears to be that the flow direction routine is producing nodata holes where the streams are becoming disjointed, but only on the super large raster. I have the data.
I'd guess there's an integer overflow issue happening somewhere here because of the size of these rasters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For a NatCap project, we have a 30m DEM of Colombia that is resulting in disjointed streams. When a single watershed within Colombia is used instead, the streams are contiguous, as we expect.
I dug into this a bit more and the root cause appears to be that the flow direction routine is producing nodata holes where the streams are becoming disjointed, but only on the super large raster. I have the data.
I'd guess there's an integer overflow issue happening somewhere here because of the size of these rasters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: