-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change member access semantics #89
Conversation
228d48c
to
13bfda0
Compare
13bfda0
to
2d5e032
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice, I am in favor of this change because it interacts well with the new entitlements changes and also has potential for helping out the mutability problem.
Co-authored-by: Jan Bernatik <[email protected]>
…flow/flips into supun/member-access-semantics
a2996d9
to
dd2825b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
|
||
More details on this problem is described in the [FLIP for improving mutability restrictions](https://github.com/onflow/flips/pull/58). | ||
|
||
This proposal is aimed at moving one step closer to solving this problem by returning references for member-access, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A strong misson statement here, and a good reason to do it. love it.
@SupunS there has not been any additional feedback for multiple weeks, let's approve and merge 🎉 |
Co-authored-by: Jan Bernatik <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bastian Müller <[email protected]>
No description provided.