ci(linter): skip linter benchmarks on unrelated file changes

[DonIsaac]

Skip building/running linter benchmarks on PRs that only change the transformer, ID, formatter, or the minifier.

[graphite-app]

Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into main

Add the label “0-merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. Or use the label “hotfix” to add to the merge queue as a hot fix.

You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

[DonIsaac]

• ci(linter): skip linter benchmarks on unrelated file changes #6705 👈
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @DonIsaac and the rest of your teammates on Graphite

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #6705 will not alter performance

_{Comparing don/10-20-ci_skip_linter_benchmarks_on_unrelated_file_changes (20633ec) with main (6a76ea8)}

Summary

✅ 30 untouched benchmarks

[overlookmotel]

This is a really good idea. The linter benchmarks are always the slowest to complete.

I'm not familiar with dorny/paths-filter, so can I just check the filter is the right way around? i.e. it will run linter benchmarks if:

• PR changes at least one file, not including files in oxc_transformer etc.

And not:

• PR does not change any files in oxc_transformer etc.

It's possible a PR might make changes to both the linter and the transformer, and we'd want linter benchmarks to run in that case.

[DonIsaac]

This is a really good idea. The linter benchmarks are always the slowest to complete.

I'm not familiar with dorny/paths-filter, so can I just check the filter is the right way around? i.e. it will run linter benchmarks if:

• PR changes at least one file, not including files in oxc_transformer etc.

And not:

• PR does not change any files in oxc_transformer etc.

It's possible a PR might make changes to both the linter and the transformer, and we'd want linter benchmarks to run in that case.

I believe so. I followed the example in CI / Conformance. I'd like a review from @Boshen before merging just to make sure this works as I think it does.