Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds a note about hooks + constructor property promotion #4264

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

weierophinney
Copy link
Contributor

Per a conversation with @Crell, added a note to detail behavior of hooks
when the set hook allows more types than the property, and is used with
constructor property promotion.

Per a conversation with @Crell, added a note to detail behavior of hooks
when the set hook allows more types than the property, and is used with
constructor property promotion.
language/oop5/property-hooks.xml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
language/oop5/property-hooks.xml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
language/oop5/property-hooks.xml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Crell
Copy link
Contributor

Crell commented Dec 12, 2024

The text looks good to me, but there's some linting issues. Once those are resolved I think we can merge this.

@weierophinney
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think I've resolved the linting issues, but the build chain does not work currently (I get errors on make detailing detected dubious ownership in repository at '/var/www/doc-base'). Will need somebody to approve the workflow to validate.

@Crell
Copy link
Contributor

Crell commented Dec 13, 2024

All clear now. @Girgias do you want to clear your change request and merge?

@Girgias Girgias merged commit c925e1a into php:master Dec 13, 2024
2 checks passed
@weierophinney weierophinney deleted the feature/property-hooks-cpp branch December 16, 2024 17:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants