Storages: Fix returned column types may not match in late-materialization (#9176)

[ti-chi-bot]

This is an automated cherry-pick of #9176

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #9175

Problem Summary: #9175

What is changed and how it works?

+------------------------+---------+--------------+---------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| id                     | estRows | task         | access object | operator info                                                      |
+------------------------+---------+--------------+---------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| TableReader_13         | 128.00  | root         |               | MppVersion: 2, data:ExchangeSender_12                              |
| └─ExchangeSender_12    | 128.00  | mpp[tiflash] |               | ExchangeType: PassThrough                                          |
|   └─Projection_5       | 128.00  | mpp[tiflash] |               | hour(test.t.a)->Column#4, test.t.i                                 |
|     └─TableFullScan_10 | 128.00  | mpp[tiflash] | table:t       | pushed down filter:eq(test.t.a, 24:11:11.123500), keep order:false |
+------------------------+---------+--------------+---------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No code

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Fix the issue of column types that may not match in late-materialization.

[JinheLin]

/run-all-tests

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JinheLin, Lloyd-Pottiger

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [JinheLin,Lloyd-Pottiger]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-07-09 06:21:38.517269089 +0000 UTC m=+338595.752503203: ☑️ agreed by JinheLin.
• 2024-07-09 06:31:52.848152362 +0000 UTC m=+339210.083386476: ☑️ agreed by Lloyd-Pottiger.

[JinheLin]

/run-all-tests

[JinheLin]

[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z] rg1_cpu_time 2249
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z] rg2_cpu_time 1826
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z] rate 0.811916
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z] /home/jenkins/agent/workspace/tiflash-build-common/tiflash/dbms/src/Flash/Pipeline/Schedule/TaskQueues/tests/gtest_resource_control_queue.cpp:483: Failure
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z] Value of: rate > 1
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z]   Actual: false
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z] Expected: true
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z] �[0;31m[  FAILED  ] �[mTestResourceControlQueue.SmallRULargeCPUDynamicTokenBucket (5876 ms)
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z] �[0;32m[----------] �[m1 test from TestResourceControlQueue (5876 ms total)
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z] 
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z] �[0;32m[----------] �[mGlobal test environment tear-down
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z] �[0;32m[==========] �[m1 test from 1 test case ran. (5877 ms total)
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z] �[0;32m[  PASSED  ] �[m0 tests.
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z] �[0;31m[  FAILED  ] �[m1 test, listed below:
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z] �[0;31m[  FAILED  ] �[mTestResourceControlQueue.SmallRULargeCPUDynamicTokenBucket
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z] 
[2024-07-09T08:02:16.126Z]  1 FAILED TEST

[JinheLin]

/run-unit-test

[JinheLin]

[2024-07-09T10:13:07.575Z] /home/jenkins/agent/workspace/tiflash-build-common/tiflash/dbms/src/Storages/KVStore/tests/gtest_raftstore_v2.cpp:361: Failure
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.575Z] Expected equality of these values:
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.575Z]   res.stats.parallels
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.575Z]     Which is: 0
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.575Z]   4
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.575Z] [2024/07/09 18:13:06.285 +08:00] [ERROR] [Exception.cpp:96] ["std::exception. Code: 1001, type: testing::AssertionException, e.what() = /home/jenkins/agent/workspace/tiflash-build-common/tiflash/dbms/src/Storages/KVStore/tests/gtest_raftstore_v2.cpp:361: Failure\nExpected equality of these values:\n  res.stats.parallels\n    Which is: 0\n  4"] [source="virtual void DB::tests::RegionKVStoreTest_KVStoreSingleSnap4_Test::TestBody()"] [thread_id=1]
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.575Z] /home/jenkins/agent/workspace/tiflash-build-common/tiflash/dbms/src/Storages/KVStore/tests/gtest_raftstore_v2.cpp:374: Failure
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.575Z] Failed
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.575Z] �[0;31m[  FAILED  ] �[mRegionKVStoreTest.KVStoreSingleSnap4 (75 ms)
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.575Z] �[0;32m[----------] �[m1 test from RegionKVStoreTest (75 ms total)
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.575Z] 
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.575Z] �[0;32m[----------] �[mGlobal test environment tear-down
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.576Z] �[0;32m[==========] �[m1 test from 1 test case ran. (77 ms total)
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.576Z] �[0;32m[  PASSED  ] �[m0 tests.
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.576Z] �[0;31m[  FAILED  ] �[m1 test, listed below:
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.576Z] �[0;31m[  FAILED  ] �[mRegionKVStoreTest.KVStoreSingleSnap4
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.576Z] 
[2024-07-09T10:13:07.576Z]  1 FAILED TEST

[JinheLin]

/run-unit-test