Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release v0.5.0 #166

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2022
Merged

Release v0.5.0 #166

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2022

Conversation

SuperQ
Copy link
Contributor

@SuperQ SuperQ commented Jul 3, 2022

Breaking Change:

The exporter config file format has changed. It now supports multiple modules
to scrape different endpoints.

Closes: #158

Signed-off-by: SuperQ [email protected]

@SuperQ SuperQ requested a review from rustycl0ck July 3, 2022 08:59
Copy link
Contributor

@yeya24 yeya24 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thank you!

Copy link
Member

@rustycl0ck rustycl0ck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, feel free to merge after a rebase for including #161

CHANGELOG.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Breaking Change:

The exporter config file format has changed. It now supports multiple modules
to scrape different endpoints.

* [FEATURE] Support custom valuetype #145
* [FEATURE] Support modules configuration #146
* [FEATURE] Accept non-2xx HTTP status #161

Signed-off-by: SuperQ <[email protected]>
@SuperQ SuperQ force-pushed the superq/release_0.5.0 branch from a859faf to 59477d6 Compare July 11, 2022 07:32
@SuperQ SuperQ merged commit 2c1ca88 into master Jul 11, 2022
@SuperQ SuperQ deleted the superq/release_0.5.0 branch July 11, 2022 07:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Issue with example
3 participants