-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move TestVariablesChecker
to functional tests
#5400
Move TestVariablesChecker
to functional tests
#5400
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like the fact that you did it for one file only, it makes it more manageable as there are small moving part to takes into account during review. What do you think about the time it took you to do the refactor ? Was it worth it ? If that's the case I'll open an issue to track each file we need to move.
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1505171962
💛 - Coveralls |
This one was okay, but I looked at some of the other files and they might be more difficult. There are tests such as |
Let's not focus too much on this then, clearly, it's not a high priority issue. I think more typing in astroid will yield better result |
Although clearly this make pylint more friendly for new contributors and removing almost 100 lines of code is obviously a very good thing.. |
I don't necessarily agree. See L160 in |
True, true. Also unittest are very hard to understand comparatively. For maintenance work it's pretty high on the list for sure. I was comparing the priority to the json output for 3.0 alpha that will make vscode and pycharm better or other high value issues directly affecting known bugs or highly demanded features. |
Type of Changes
Description
Step one of many.