Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport maintenance/2.17.x] Don't consider Union to always be a type alias #8491

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 23, 2023

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport 07127ee from #8489.

Co-authored-by: Pierre Sassoulas <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 07127ee)
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added the False Positive 🦟 A message is emitted but nothing is wrong with the code label Mar 23, 2023
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added this to the 2.17.2 milestone Mar 23, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 23, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #8491 (3fefae0) into maintenance/2.17.x (b9c1ab3) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           maintenance/2.17.x    #8491   +/-   ##
===================================================
  Coverage               95.56%   95.56%           
===================================================
  Files                     178      178           
  Lines                   18779    18780    +1     
===================================================
+ Hits                    17947    17948    +1     
  Misses                    832      832           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pylint/checkers/base/name_checker/checker.py 98.58% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

@DanielNoord DanielNoord merged commit ebf1952 into maintenance/2.17.x Mar 23, 2023
@DanielNoord DanielNoord deleted the backport-8489-to-maintenance/2.17.x branch March 23, 2023 22:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
False Positive 🦟 A message is emitted but nothing is wrong with the code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants