-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Alternarive for bpo-29553 - Fixed ArgumentParses format_usage for mutually exclusive groups #120
Alternarive for bpo-29553 - Fixed ArgumentParses format_usage for mutually exclusive groups #120
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See #117 (comment) about tests I left in #117.
@berkerpeksag thanks! just updated my PR. |
Misc/NEWS
Outdated
@@ -251,6 +251,7 @@ Library | |||
|
|||
- bpo-29576: Improve some deprecations in importlib. Some deprecated methods | |||
now emit DeprecationWarnings and have better descriptive messages. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need an empty line here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@zhangyangyu updated, sorry! thanks!
Stackless now correctly grabs and releases the head_mutex, if it iterates over the linked list of Py_ThreadState structures. https://bitbucket.org/stackless-dev/stackless/issues/120 (grafted from 1fb75d58a98083b2547746adb21fa238bbf8135a)
This commit fixes a regression introduced by commit fc13eecdd0ad. When I grafted the patch for this issue from branch 2.7-slp (1fb75d58a), I forgot to remove a 2.7-slp only part of the code. In effect, this change reapplies commit b8a8122bbb91. https://bitbucket.org/stackless-dev/stackless/issues/120
To try and help move older pull requests forward, we are going through and backfilling 'awaiting' labels on pull requests that are lacking the label. Based on the current reviews, the best we can tell in an automated fashion is that a core developer requested changes to be made to this pull request. If/when the requested changes have been made, please leave a comment that says, |
Superseded by PR #14976. |
Fix for https://bugs.python.org/issue29553
Alternative to #117
This alternative advised by Christoph Stahl and Brian Curtin