Fix React warning for sourcePosition prop #356
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bradbyte
changed the title
|
Hi there, thanks for your patience! This looks good to me! Could you point this PR to the v5 branch? https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/github/collaborating-with-issues-and-pull-requests/changing-the-base-branch-of-a-pull-request and fix merge conflicts if there are any? |
wooorm
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 12, 2021
* Replace `renderers` w/ `components` * Replace `allowNode` w/ `allowElement`, which is now given a hast element (as the first parameter) * Replace `allowedTypes` w/ `allowedElements` * Replace `disallowedTypes` w/ `disallowedElements` * Change signature of `linkTarget` and `transformLinkUri`, which are now given hast children (as the second parameter) * Change signature of `transformImageUri`, which is now given the `alt` string as the second parameter (instead of the fourth) * Replace `plugins` w/ `remarkPlugins` (backwards compatible change) * Add `rehypePlugins` * Change `includeNodeIndex` to `includeElementIndex`: it still sets an `index`, but that value now represents the number of preceding elements, it also sets a `siblingCount` (instead of `parentChildCount`) with the number of sibling elements in the parent * The `columnAlignment` prop is no longer given to table elements: it’s available as `style` on `th` and `td` elements instead * The `spread` prop is no longer given to list elements: it’s already handled Remove buggy HTML parsers from core * If you want HTML, add [`rehype-raw`](https://github.com/rehypejs/rehype-raw) to `rehypePlugins` and it’ll work without bugs! * Remove `allowDangerousHtml` (previously called `escapeHtml`) option: pass `rehype-raw` in `rehypePlugins` to allow HTML instead * Remove `with-html.js`, `plugins/html-parser.js` entries from library * Remove naïve HTML parser too: either use `rehype-raw` to properly support HTML, or don’t allow it at all Closes GH-549. Closes GH-563. The following issues are solved as rehype is now available: Closes GH-522. Closes GH-465. Closes GH-427. Closes GH-384. Closes GH-356. The following issues are solved as a proper HTML parser (`rehype-raw`) is now available: Closes GH-562. Closes GH-460. Closes GH-454. Closes GH-452. Closes GH-433. Closes GH-386. Closes GH-385. Closes GH-345. Closes GH-320. Closes GH-302. Closes GH-267. Closes GH-259. The following issues are solved as docs are improved: Closes GH-251.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello,
Thanks so much for maintaining this awesome library!
I started using the
rawSourcePosprop and noticed a React warning about a DOM property being set forsourcePosition. I traced the error to therootrenderer and found it wasn't using thegetCorePropscleaning method. I updated the renderer to use it and still allow forclassNameto be set. Also added a test to ensure the root doesn't rendersourcePositionprops (the test failed before my fix was in place).Here's the warning I was getting...
