-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 394
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor: merge ArchetypeFieldInfo
into the reflection
module
#6616
Labels
Comments
5 tasks
emilk
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 24, 2024
### What * Part of #6556 Now that we can override all kinds of components in the UI, we should also take care to explain them to the user. Previously all the user had to go on was the name. With this PR they get the first line of the docstring for the component, plus a link to the full docs on our website. This required adding a new (generated) reflection API. ![image](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/assets/1148717/358b1517-a36f-4b7c-8dd0-fc42f29a2e78) Best reviewed commit-by-commit. ### Related * lampsitter/egui_commonmark#54 ### Later PR * #6616 ### Checklist * [x] I have read and agree to [Contributor Guide](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) * [x] I've included a screenshot or gif (if applicable) * [x] I have tested the web demo (if applicable): * Using examples from latest `main` build: [rerun.io/viewer](https://rerun.io/viewer/pr/6609?manifest_url=https://app.rerun.io/version/main/examples_manifest.json) * Using full set of examples from `nightly` build: [rerun.io/viewer](https://rerun.io/viewer/pr/6609?manifest_url=https://app.rerun.io/version/nightly/examples_manifest.json) * [x] The PR title and labels are set such as to maximize their usefulness for the next release's CHANGELOG * [x] If applicable, add a new check to the [release checklist](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/tests/python/release_checklist)! - [PR Build Summary](https://build.rerun.io/pr/6609) - [Recent benchmark results](https://build.rerun.io/graphs/crates.html) - [Wasm size tracking](https://build.rerun.io/graphs/sizes.html) To run all checks from `main`, comment on the PR with `@rerun-bot full-check`. --------- Co-authored-by: Andreas Reich <[email protected]>
emilk
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 25, 2024
### What * Closes #6616 Replaces the previous code with the new reflection code. For now I decided that the archetype reflection is still opt-in (with `attr.rust.generate_field_info`) just to reduce the amount of strings bloating our .wasm binary. We can easily change this in the future if we want to. ### Checklist * [x] I have read and agree to [Contributor Guide](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and the [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md) * [x] I've included a screenshot or gif (if applicable) * [x] I have tested the web demo (if applicable): * Using examples from latest `main` build: [rerun.io/viewer](https://rerun.io/viewer/pr/6623?manifest_url=https://app.rerun.io/version/main/examples_manifest.json) * Using full set of examples from `nightly` build: [rerun.io/viewer](https://rerun.io/viewer/pr/6623?manifest_url=https://app.rerun.io/version/nightly/examples_manifest.json) * [x] The PR title and labels are set such as to maximize their usefulness for the next release's CHANGELOG * [x] If applicable, add a new check to the [release checklist](https://github.com/rerun-io/rerun/blob/main/tests/python/release_checklist)! - [PR Build Summary](https://build.rerun.io/pr/6623) - [Recent benchmark results](https://build.rerun.io/graphs/crates.html) - [Wasm size tracking](https://build.rerun.io/graphs/sizes.html) To run all checks from `main`, comment on the PR with `@rerun-bot full-check`.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
#6609 added a reflection API for components (
ComponentName
-> docstrings).We should use the same interface and system for the
ArchetypeFieldInfo
/attr.rust.generate_field_info
stuff, which is another form of reflection.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: