Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade test #167

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 11, 2023
Merged

Upgrade test #167

merged 7 commits into from
Jul 11, 2023

Conversation

slinkydeveloper
Copy link
Collaborator

@slinkydeveloper slinkydeveloper added this to the 1B milestone Jul 7, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 7, 2023

Test Results

  76 files  +3    76 suites  +3   6m 40s ⏱️ +11s
  63 tests +3    62 ✔️ +3  1 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
163 runs  +9  162 ✔️ +9  1 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 4527a92. ± Comparison against base commit 63d1781.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@slinkydeveloper slinkydeveloper force-pushed the issues/restate_504 branch 4 times, most recently from 02c48de to 98872c6 Compare July 10, 2023 10:34
@slinkydeveloper slinkydeveloper force-pushed the issues/restate_504 branch 2 times, most recently from 1eb5b61 to c22fdb6 Compare July 10, 2023 13:03
Copy link
Contributor

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for creating this PR @slinkydeveloper. The changes look good to me. +1 for merging after the required runtime PRs are merged.

Comment on lines +38 to +39
UpgradeTestServiceGrpc.SERVICE_NAME,
AwakeableHolderServiceGrpc.SERVICE_NAME,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am wondering whether we shouldn't implement the services for the general tests with the typescript SDK if possible. That way we don't further cement our dependency on the Java SDK.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair enough. Do you think should I go and re implement this test in TS or is this comment more something for future tests?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's try to do it for new tests from now on, I'd say.

@slinkydeveloper slinkydeveloper merged commit 3b2dbfd into main Jul 11, 2023
@slinkydeveloper slinkydeveloper deleted the issues/restate_504 branch July 11, 2023 13:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

E2e: Version upgrade
2 participants