-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Ruby 2.7 to build matrix #2271
Conversation
@@ -37,3 +37,4 @@ environment: | |||
- ruby_version: 24-x64 | |||
- ruby_version: 25-x64 | |||
- ruby_version: 26-x64 | |||
- ruby_version: 27-x64 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we even run AppVeyor, or can we drop this config?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No no for me we have to keep it. Why would you want to remove it? :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It doesn't seem to be configured https://ci.appveyor.com/project/rspec/rspec-rails, and we don't seem to run it (example passed and merged pull request #2267, see View Details).
No objections on keeping it, just wondering why we need it since we've divorced rspec-rails
from other RSpec projects, and even updating common Travis files mostly doesn't apply.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes your are right. A little bit of context I think #1218 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the clarification! Let's keep it until someone volunteers to properly add build support.
0490c6d
to
f183132
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Happy to merge this when it's green :)
😆 Let's see what I can do with the rest, but in any case, we'll have to wait for another Rails release first. I'll keep this open as a reminder. |
Grepped the following from https://travis-ci.org/rspec/rspec-rails/jobs/641857791 mostly.
|
Hey @pirj do you want to update this? I might take a look otherwise... |
On it 👍 |
@@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ def self.run_all(reporter=nil) | |||
mocks.verify_doubled_constant_names = true | |||
end | |||
|
|||
config.expect_with :rspec do |c| | |||
c.max_formatted_output_length = 1000 | |||
end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unrelated, but very helpful at times, especially in this repo.
3dee0c9
to
db68e5f
Compare
You could add this 28f9597 |
* Add Ruby 2.7 to build matrix * Increase formatted output length Co-authored-by: Jon Rowe <[email protected]>
Also, use latest Ruby patch versions
Spec failure is fixed in #2270