Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustdoc --check option documentation #94015

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 16, 2022
Merged

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Part of #92763.

r? @notriddle

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez added T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. A-docs Area: Documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools labels Feb 15, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 15, 2022
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Updated (and thanks for the doc suggestion!).

@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 15, 2022

📌 Commit 571e766447b25e8de12b6908b7caa850aeb7862c has been approved by notriddle

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 15, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Forgot that all code blocks are rust ones by default...

@bors: r-

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 15, 2022
@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

Okay.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 15, 2022

📌 Commit 590ca7e has been approved by notriddle

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 15, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2022
…iddle

rustdoc --check option documentation

Part of rust-lang#92763.

r? `@notriddle`
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2022
…iddle

rustdoc --check option documentation

Part of rust-lang#92763.

r? ``@notriddle``
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#92366 (Resolve concern of `derive_default_enum`)
 - rust-lang#93382 (Add a bit more padding in search box)
 - rust-lang#93962 (Make [u8]::cmp implementation branchless)
 - rust-lang#94015 (rustdoc --check option documentation)
 - rust-lang#94017 (Clarify confusing UB statement in MIR)
 - rust-lang#94020 (Support pretty printing of invalid constants)
 - rust-lang#94027 (Update browser UI test version)
 - rust-lang#94037 (Fix inconsistent symbol mangling with -Zverbose)
 - rust-lang#94045 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#94054 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 75a631d into rust-lang:master Feb 16, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Feb 16, 2022
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the check-option branch February 16, 2022 22:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-docs Area: Documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants