-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor: use format-args-capture
and remove unnecessary nested if blocks in some parts of rust_passes
#95074
Conversation
r? @lcnr (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
c502fc8
to
018e925
Compare
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 018e925e866b8c9c6807714b77e15d8df5df667a has been approved by |
@bors r- |
didn't know about the revert, considering that the reason was a perf regression @bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
⌛ Trying commit 018e925e866b8c9c6807714b77e15d8df5df667a with merge b3fc9cd52d12e5aa8124ad61828ef7ffa3c37dc1... |
@rustbot ready |
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
⌛ Trying commit c777efe6513eaa452bbd78f9794fec913014c500 with merge ffda9900c208508649f68118720ab65d0e3c8403... |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Queued ffda9900c208508649f68118720ab65d0e3c8403 with parent 051d117, future comparison URL. |
Finished benchmarking commit (ffda9900c208508649f68118720ab65d0e3c8403): comparison url. Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant results. If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR led to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never |
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit c777efe6513eaa452bbd78f9794fec913014c500 has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit c777efe6513eaa452bbd78f9794fec913014c500 with merge 784b4391b003bde69913a996d2c2831c8b211fa4... |
✌️ @TaKO8Ki can now approve this pull request |
…some parts of rustc_passes break before the `&&` Update compiler/rustc_passes/src/check_const.rs Co-authored-by: bjorn3 <[email protected]>
6a2bcf7
to
7262066
Compare
@bors r=lcnr |
📌 Commit 7262066 has been approved by |
…-remove-unnecessary-nesting-in-rustc-passes, r=lcnr Refactor: use `format-args-capture` and remove unnecessary nested if blocks in some parts of `rust_passes`
…askrgr Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#95074 (Refactor: use `format-args-capture` and remove unnecessary nested if blocks in some parts of `rust_passes`) - rust-lang#95085 (Return err instead of ICE) - rust-lang#95116 (Add needs-* directives to many tests) - rust-lang#95129 (Remove animation on source sidebar) - rust-lang#95166 (Update the unstable book with the new `values()` form of check-cfg) - rust-lang#95175 (move `adt_const_params` to its own tracking issue) Failed merges: r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
No description provided.