fix more missing links to stdatamodels docs

[braingram]

It appears #7657 was incomplete as while looking at other docs I found another broken link to and malformed comment about stdatamodels. I believe this PR should fix all the broken links and erroneous comments.

Checklist for maintainers

• added entry in CHANGES.rst within the relevant release section
• updated or added relevant tests
• updated relevant documentation
• added relevant milestone
• added relevant label(s)
• ran regression tests, post a link to the Jenkins job below.
  How to run regression tests on a PR
• Make sure the JIRA ticket is resolved properly

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (1025a09) 76.62% compared to head (71a5306) 76.62%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #7672   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.62%   76.62%           
=======================================
  Files         456      456           
  Lines       36833    36833           
=======================================
  Hits        28223    28223           
  Misses       8610     8610           

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
nightly	77.43% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 1025a09

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[hbushouse]

Updates look good. I would like to see a change log entry for this. List it under documentation.

[braingram]

Should I run regression tests on this PR or can those be skipped since it's only changing docs?

[hbushouse]

Should I run regression tests on this PR or can those be skipped since it's only changing docs?

regtests aren't necessary, for the reason you mention. Should check the docs build from the CI tests though, just to confirm that all the updated links are good now.

[braingram]

Should I run regression tests on this PR or can those be skipped since it's only changing docs?

regtests aren't necessary, for the reason you mention. Should check the docs build from the CI tests though, just to confirm that all the updated links are good now.

Thanks! The updated links all look good to me (links below are to pages which contain the updated links in the docs built with this PR):
https://jwst-pipeline--7672.org.readthedocs.build/en/7672/getting_started/quickstart.html#
https://jwst-pipeline--7672.org.readthedocs.build/en/7672/jwst/associations/overview.html#utilities
https://jwst-pipeline--7672.org.readthedocs.build/en/7672/jwst/model_blender/main.html#using-model-blender
https://jwst-pipeline--7672.org.readthedocs.build/en/7672/jwst/stpipe/user_step.html#configuring-a-step