-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rcal 738 Process data with at least 16 resultants (SOC-1069 & SOC-1070) #1059
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Eddie Schlafly <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Eddie Schlafly <[email protected]>
…pacetelescope#1055) Co-authored-by: Eddie Schlafly <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Zach Burnett <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Eddie Schlafly <[email protected]>
…pacetelescope#1055) Co-authored-by: Eddie Schlafly <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Zach Burnett <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me. One question: in principle we could ask RTB to put one of these files into CRDS, and we could make our default files use them. The we could just add additional logging to the existing tests rather than create new ones, and we wouldn't be dependent on another set of separately created files. Is that direction worth pursuing?
Yes, we should pursue that. I'd like to see the 16 resultant data and
dark files be on the INS list
of "standard" files to generate and have the dark ref files in CRDS.
I'm assuming that there will be a MA table for 16 resultants at some
point, I don't know if we have
one currently.
…On 1/11/24 8:22 AM, Eddie Schlafly wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
This looks good to me. One question: in principle we could ask RTB to
put one of these files into CRDS, and we could make our default files
use them. The we could just add additional logging to the existing
tests rather than create new ones, and we wouldn't be dependent on
another set of separately created files. Is that direction worth pursuing?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/spacetelescope/romancal/pull/1059*pullrequestreview-1815573260__;Iw!!CrWY41Z8OgsX0i-WU-0LuAcUu2o!1ydztPnRuQAueviwCzAu54cWPZjtF9Eq7PWhRtoDyxmGiUlFTfMu6ig5WWtnsdcZnkwAEw8ScLCn__-wZbgittHL$>,
or unsubscribe
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALXCXWPSCLJOEF3NEH5PTMTYN7RRNAVCNFSM6AAAAABBWOFZO2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMYTQMJVGU3TGMRWGA__;!!CrWY41Z8OgsX0i-WU-0LuAcUu2o!1ydztPnRuQAueviwCzAu54cWPZjtF9Eq7PWhRtoDyxmGiUlFTfMu6ig5WWtnsdcZnkwAEw8ScLCn__-wZUQipVXt$>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
fa70647
to
5212a93
Compare
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1059 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 76.72% 76.72%
=======================================
Files 105 105
Lines 7015 7015
=======================================
Hits 5382 5382
Misses 1633 1633
*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
…0) (spacetelescope#1059) Co-authored-by: Eddie Schlafly <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Zach Burnett <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Resolves RCAL-738
Resolves RCAL-740
Closes #1047 #1048
This PR adds tests for processing data with 16 resultants for imaging a spectral data.
For imaging
For the spectral data
Checklist
CHANGES.rst
under the corresponding subsectionhttps://plwishmaster.stsci.edu:8081/job/RT/job/Roman-Developers-Pull-Requests/532/