update jump detection for stcal changes

[braingram]

stcal recently updated jump detection and ramp fitting.
https://github.com/spacetelescope/stcal/releases/tag/1.4.0

This PR only addresses the jump detection changes (which changed the number of returned values).

The new returned values are ignored in this PR to fix the errors introduced by these changes.

I am not familiar with the arguments or return values for this function so a check for validity (and not just relying on a lack of failures) is needed.

Checklist

• added entry in CHANGES.rst under the corresponding subsection
• updated relevant tests
• updated relevant documentation
• updated relevant milestone(s)
• added relevant label(s)

Regression tests run (against stcal main which is now released):
https://plwishmaster.stsci.edu:8081/blue/organizations/jenkins/RT%2FRoman-Developers-Pull-Requests/detail/Roman-Developers-Pull-Requests/257/pipeline/206/

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.02 ⚠️

Comparison is base (7d5d5fd) 75.72% compared to head (01a94a8) 75.70%.

❗ Current head 01a94a8 differs from pull request most recent head c35f3bf. Consider uploading reports for the commit c35f3bf to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #723      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.72%   75.70%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          90       90              
  Lines        5478     5478              
==========================================
- Hits         4148     4147       -1     
- Misses       1330     1331       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
nightly	64.54% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️	Carriedforward from f42b0de

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
romancal/jump/jump_step.py	96.05% <0.00%> (-1.32%)	⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[braingram]

Regression tests with currently release stcal shows no errors:
https://plwishmaster.stsci.edu:8081/blue/organizations/jenkins/RT%2FRoman-Developers-Pull-Requests/detail/Roman-Developers-Pull-Requests/256/pipeline/205

Run with stcal main show failures for ramp fitting:
https://plwishmaster.stsci.edu:8081/blue/organizations/jenkins/RT%2FRoman-Developers-Pull-Requests/detail/Roman-Developers-Pull-Requests/257/pipeline/206

test_one_group_small_buffer_fit_ols (all 4 parameterizations)

[ddavis-stsci]

LGTM, if you could add the Roman-Developers-Pull-Requests link #257 to the checklist.
I'll take care of the ramp fit errors you are seeing.

[ddavis-stsci]

Can you also change pyproject.toml to pin 'stcal >=1.4.0',

[braingram]

Can you also change pyproject.toml to pin 'stcal >=1.4.0',

Thanks for taking a look at this and thanks for looking into the ramp fitting changes.

Anything I can do to help finish up this PR?

[ddavis-stsci]

I think we're good to go!