Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cache and resend, rather than recreate, builder API registrations #4040

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 31, 2022
Merged

Conversation

tersec
Copy link
Contributor

@tersec tersec commented Aug 26, 2022

continue
if validator.externalBuilderRegistration.isNone:
let validatorRegistration =
await node.getValidatorRegistration(validator, epoch)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if someone adds a validator via rest api, I'm guessing this await can get interleaved (cc @zah?)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In general, there are lots of the usual kinds approaches people use when modifying sequences in place, but for this purpose, it mostly matters whether table mvalues iteration works with that. It's fine if some new validator is missed this epoch around in that scenario, and it's even fine to just abort the table scan in a given epoch if there's any issues of this sort. I'd prefer either, ideally, to adding more internal buffering to this function of information on all attached validators, but that could, ultimately, solve this.

Copy link
Contributor

@zah zah Aug 29, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The problem here is that the contents of the validators table may change while you are iterating over it. This would be detected as a Defect by the standard library.

The standard work-around is to copy the list of validators prior to starting the iteration by iterating over dup(node.attachedValidators[].validators.values).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cf539c9 works around this. Rather than copy the values in their entirety, which would be a better approach for a read-only application, here it copies the keys, because it's more obviously symmetrical that the access mechanism that works for reading also works for writing.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 27, 2022

Unit Test Results

       12 files  ±0       860 suites  ±0   1h 13m 18s ⏱️ - 1m 26s
  1 982 tests ±0    1 835 ✔️ ±0  147 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
10 662 runs  ±0  10 472 ✔️ ±0  190 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 2629ac3. ± Comparison against base commit 574b84f.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants